Christian Leftist

The Pope has said that destroying aberrant sexuality — IOW, any sexual orientation or behavior that does not fall within post-marital, cis-gendered, heteronormative parameters — is as important work in the eyes of God as saving the environment.

Gender theory explores sexual orientation, the roles assigned by society to individuals according to their gender, and how people perceive their biological identity.

Gay and transsexual groups, particularly in the United States, promote it as a key to understanding and tolerance, but the Pope disagreed.

When the Roman Catholic Church defends God’s Creation, “it does not only defend the earth, water and the air… but (it) also protects man from his own destruction,” he said.

“Rainforests deserve, yes, our protection, but the human being … does not deserve it less,” the pontiff said.

Mmmkay. Yeah, I’ll go with The Pointy Hat Is Batshit Insane for $500, Alex. (thanks for the link to Ann Somerville.)

So…why do people still listen to this bigoted old geezer, again?

Our President-Elect has decided to try to appease the Religious Right (an impossible task for someone who is pro-choice, as most experienced politicians will tell you) by inviting the bigot Rick Warren to speak the invocation at his presidential inauguration ceremony.

So, so Not Cool.

The media really has done a bang-up job on making Rick Warren seem more moderate than he really is, or at least they did until he openly supported Proposition 8, that horrible and unconstitutional referendum in California that made equality marriage illegal.

GBLT groups and gay right advocates and allies are furious about Obama’s conscious decision to hurt GBLT people by selecting a man who has equated them with child abusers, incestuous couples and pedophiles for wanting to marry and have the same rights as the rest of us. He falsely claimed that religious officials would be prosecuted for hate speech if Prop. 8 was defeated, even though no one was seeking to prosecute religious officials for saying that homosexuality is a sin while 20,000 GBLT couples married in California before the ban.

Among the other choice beliefs that Rick Warren will be representing by his presence at the Inauguration — and that, by extension, P-E Barack Obama will be condoning — are, in no particular order:

· Women do not have the right to decide what happens to their own bodies. Instead, men in religious robes and in courts and legislatures will choose what health care is ‘moral’ or ‘immoral.’
· The president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, should be assassinated.
· Embryonic stem-cell research, even research done on embryos that would otherwise be destroyed, is evil and wrong and should be banned, no matter how many lives it might save.

To be sure, Mr. Warren has done much for the causes of poverty in Africa, AIDS prevention, and environmental protection within the evangelical community. That is commendable. His good deeds, however, do not erase the harms he has done in the name of God against people who only want to live their lives in peace and comfort.

Obama contends that he is merely returning the favor that Warren paid him when he invited Obama to speak at his Global AIDS Initiative Conference.

But Obama is not inviting Warren to be a guest speaker at his church. He is not extending an invitation for tea at his Chicago home. He is picking someone who fundamentally believes that one in ten people on the planet (and all of the non-evangelical people besides those) have flaws that make them inferior to him, a lower class of species, second-class citizens, and inviting him to be the representative of all people of faith during one of the most profound events in modern history.

There are plenty of pastors who do not believe all of the prejudice crap Rick Warren does who are ready, willing and able to speak instead of him. Obam chose Warren, knowing full well that it would be the second in a series of slaps in the faces of gay people that they’ve had to and are going to face this year from Washington, D.C.

How are we supposed to believe that intersectionality, this promise to address all areas of inequality, if progressives are marginalized? This is not a ’social issue.’ This is a HUMAN RIGHTS issue.

Remember that if interracial marriage had been put to a vote in the sixties when the Supreme Court ruled on the Loving case, California would have banned interracial marriage, too. What is popular is not always right, and what is right is not always popular.

Old (Bible) verse, same as the first.

I’ve been so busy with job hunting and volunteering for the Obama campaign that I literally have had to bookmark about 20 or so stories I’ve found in the past week that are so ridiculous or rage-inducing that I have to blog about them someday. I hope I’ll catch up to the present. Here’s one that is both fresh and prescient, a news byte I guarantee will not make the front pages of many papers tomorrow.

From the Davenport Liveblog of a McCain rally by John Deeth of the Iowa Independent:

Before McCain’s arrival, a minister delivering an invocation said, “There are plenty of people around the world who are praying to their god, be they Hindu, Buddah, or Allah, that (McCain’s) opponent wins. I pray that you step forward and honor your own name.”

I ask that you re-read that and let the works sink in for a moment.

This is one of those nasty, devilishly clever smears against one’s opponent that the McCain campaign has let others make for them or don’t care if they make or not because they’ll benefit from the consequences regardless.

1. It states a point that is nearly impossible to prove or disprove and that the Obama campaign may not want to disprove: there are a ton of people outside of the U.S.A., many of them people of color and/or non-Christians, who believe that the Democratic candidate’s victory would be immensely better for the earth at large and who are hoping and probably praying that Obama wins the presidential election.

I don’t personally have a problem with that, though it is clear from the context of the location where the minister spoke the words, his explicit identification of non-white and non-Christian people of faith, and the sentence that the minister does. When every single country in the world outside of ours except for Russia, Israel and religiously-controlled dictatorships would elect a Democrat over a Republican, a Leftist over a Rightist, a Liberal over a Conservative as defined in America, I have to conclude that they might have a point. They feel their interests are intimately connected to our own. They have seen, fron far less biased viewpoints, in most cases, the cause and effect of American politics and our government’s economic and foreign policies. It has very little or nothing to do with their individual religion in most cases, except when they’re bemoaning the path on which George W. Bush’s religion of blind faith and blockheaded attitude has taken him during his quest for “freedom.” This brings me to the second point.

2. By stating that scary, non-Christian brown people (OMG! OMG! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!!!!1!11) want Obama elected, the minister implies that everyone outside of McCain supporters are in on some big secret that they aren’t. That Obama is a Seekrit Muslim, maybe?

Thus, the actions of millions of people over whom Obama has absolutely no control prove that ‘Obama is a dangerous terrorist who must be stopped.’

…Say whaa?

3. But wait, that’s not all! Not only do you get a nice, healthy dose or race-baiting, fear-mongering medicine, but you also receive a free sample of religious prejudice and judgemental hypocrisy!

You see, anyone who votes for Obama, That One, The Other Fella, well, they aren’t REAL Christians. They’re just fake Christians who will burn in Hell when Jesus shows up and takes over. Don’t count on receiving Communion if your priest sees that O-shaped bumper sticker on your car.

This, my fellow human beings, is how you smear someone without actually coming out and saying what you really feel. Wrap it up in the professional cloak of one’s religion, disguise it as pseudo-fact, then repackage it as a call to arms for the faithful and sell it back to the sheeple in a somber prep speech.

What’s the worst part about this? It probably happens every day in pulpits across the country. We just don’t see it because most of us have never wanted to look for it before.

Well, you knew the gloves were going to come off when the McCain campaign became desperate to stop its ticket from bleeding voters. Now we know the depths of utter depravity that they will sink to in order to win.

They can’t win on the economy, as McCain’s own advisor has pointed out:

McCain and his agents are “gambling that he can distract you with smears rather than talk to you about substance,” Obama added. “They’d rather try to tear our campaign down than lift this country up. It’s what you do when you’re out of touch, out of ideas and running out of time.”

McCain’s course correction reflects a growing case of nerves within his high command as the electoral map has shifted significantly in Obama’s favor in the past two weeks.

“It’s a dangerous road, but we have no choice,” a top McCain strategist told the Daily News. “If we keep talking about the economic crisis, we’re going to lose.”

What they’re doing instead is trying to create an air of ‘dangerous mystery’ about Obama, as if no one’s been scrutinizing his entire life under a miscroscope for the past four years and he’s too risky a bet to make in the face of our current problems. They have used William Ayers, a former Weathermen radical who is unrepentant about his role in bombings during the turbulent sixties and who now teaches as a professor in Chicago, as proof of Obama’s hatred of this country. Apparently, because Ayers and Obama served on the boards of two charaities together and Obama once let Ayers hold a coffee event at Ayers’ house for him before he knew who Ayers was, Obama is frolicking through the meadows of democracy in a skip holding hands with terrorists.

Oh, please. McPalin, tell me you have a few useful cards tucked up your sleeve. Tell me you haven’t staked your presidential bid on the hope that we’re all going to ignore our livelihoods falling apart all around us and the world economy crumbling into dust and instead listen to you spout off veiled hate speech. Tell me you aren’t betting your presidency on the Islamophobia and bigotry of the American people. TELL ME you have a better plan hidden away that THAT.

Here are a bunch of links, starting with one to the video above:
Olbermann 2008.10.07 - McCain Campaign Incites Mob Mentality
Obama Hatred At McCain-Palin Rallies: “Terrorist! Kill Him!” (a shorter excerpt from the clip above)
McCain Rally Speaker Refers to Obama’s Middle Name
McCain renewing harsh criticism of Obama (Associated Press)
Call Off the Pit Bull (by Kathleen Parker of the Washington Post)

… Damn.

So why didn’t McCain bring this up during the second debate last night? Well, the questions Tom Brokaw chose didn’t address the personalities of either candidate, and when Obama simply tried to answer McCain’s blatant lies about his tax policies, Brokaw told him to abide by the rules, so Obama talked about them in the next answer in a clever tie-in and McCain ridiculed him for it. It just highlights how the format of debates, even town hall meetings are too restrictive to free conversation. On the other hand, McCain might have done himself even more harm, as independents, especially women, saw McCain’s attacks last night as irrelevant, distracting, and annoying.

McCain’s really in a lose-lose situation: if he doesn’t address these issues, he looks two-faced, and if he does, he looks petty. So why say them at all? Because he has to shore up his base of racists, sexists, and ignorant jerks, naturally, and the best way to do that is to shout “Taxes! Taxes! Taxes!” and scare people away from his opponent.

It’s not sad that McCain is probably going to lose this fight. What’s sad is that there are enough petty-minded, hypocritical, shallow, evil people to make such a strategy effective.