Christian Leftist
The “Christian” “Right” is neither.

Christian Leftist

Senator Ted Stevens, R-Alaska: Now a Convicted Felon, Still a Jerk

You’d think that any politician convicted of seven criminal felony charges and facing significant jail time, possibly for the rest of his natural life, would quit while he was behind and call it a day.

But this is not just any old politician. This isn’t even any old senator.

Oh no. This is Senator Ted Stevens of the “Alaska Is Always First!” persuasion we’re talking about, and Sen. Stevens is the kind of guy who would rise from the dead just so he could shoot at noisy neighborhood kids to scare them off his lawn.

Now that the longest-serving Republican senator ever is a seven-time convicted felon, he’s decided not only to appeal the conviction, on which he has several legitimate reasons to do so, he’s also refusing to drop out of his senate race to re-election.

Before the conviction announcement by the jury yesterday, Stevens was in a virtual dead heat with Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich last week according to a poll done there. It’s unclear whether Sen. Stevens will win re-election, considering he is only the fifth U.S. Senator to ever be convicted of a felony while in office.

The verdict was a huge blow to Stevens, who had pushed through his lawyers for a speedy trial (and what he hoped was a speedy acquittal) before Election Day. Now, with seven days left before November 4th, there isn’t enough time to have an appeal approved before voters go to the polls to decide his fate.

Just this past Sunday, Stevens’s attorneys were expressing impatience and frustration at the dismissal and replacement of one juror with an alternate after the juror’s mother died and she cut off contact with the judge. They were concerned that the verdict would not arrive soon enough. With the results the opposite of what Stevens’s team had wanted, one can assume they are regretting the decision to request a speedy trial.

The real kicker? Today, the press announced that Alaska Governor and GOP Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin has disavowed his actions, Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell is too worried about losing his own seat in a re-election bid to care much, and even Arizona Senator and GOP Presidential Candidate John McCain says Stevens should resign.

You know it’s going to be a bad week when the head of your party and that party’s presidential candidate says you should call it a day and go home.

To top off the ludicrousness of the situation, Stevens probably can’t even vote for himself in the election. That’s right: Alaska law says that convicted felons cannot vote until their sentences are served and completed.

However, there’s apparently no law that says convicted felons can’t run for Congress. Irony, pinch me, please. I think my brain just left the building, and I want it back.

Similar Stories:
  • The Family Values Hypocrisy Carnival continues
  • Things I Learned From The Colbert Report: Bye, bye, Walruses!
  • October 28th, 2008 . by Christian Leftist Posted in Election 2008, criminal justice, senate races | No Comments » Print This Post Print This Post


    Electioneering, Voter Suppression, and Caging! Oh My!

    Bring On the Fashion Police

    My advice to voters in this election is this: if you wear campaign buttons, stickers or t-shirts on November 4th, bring a change of clothes. In general, ‘passive electioneering’ is legal on a county-by-county basis. Although the Supreme Court would probably overturn an outright ban on personal opinions covering one’s person, your knowledge of the law won’t help you to vote if poll officials deem you to be disturbing the peace or disrupting the political process. It’s great to make a legal stand — but the chances of winning a court case on civil rights may well depend on who you elect as our next president, so weigh your priorities carefully.

    In Pennsylvania, for example, there is pending litigation on ‘passive’ and ‘active electioneering.’ Two poll workers filed a lawsuit against PA state because they want labels, pins, logos and slogans promoting specific campaigns to fall under the label of ‘passive electioneering’ and therefore be prohibited, even though that practice is not technically illegal if people wearing signs or advertisements make no efforts to influence peole inside the polls other than wearing political items. This follows an earlier decision by the PA State Supreme Court that says that poll works should use discretion and decide in each county what constitutes ‘active electioneering.’ The poll workers feel that the vague language forces them to be fashion police.

    Hey, poll workers? Before you start yanking people’s pins off their lapels, you might want to enforce the law by keeping all of those taped yard signs off of the front of the church where I votes, because I know that’s within a hundred feet of the voting booths, and no one is standing there wearing them all day.

    Voter Suppression

    In Lake County, Indiana, voters might have had drive more than an hour to get to the polls early if it weren’t for a federal court appeal that lost on October 6th. Early voting is normally only allowed in a caounty clerk’s office. Around the county center, Crown Point, there are three suburbs along Lake Erie with more than 40 percent of the county’s total population that are more than an hour’s driving distance from that office. Although voters were allowed to go to “satellite” voting offices during the primaries, on Septermber 24th, two Republican election board officials voted against opening up satellite voting centers. The measure passed 3-2, but the county Republican Party argued that state law requires a unanimous vote to approve satellite voting, and they vowed to sue. The county Democratic Party responded that voting centers located in a county clerk’s office don’t fall under such jurisdiction. It was one big mess until a judge in federal court ruled that the early satellite voting could take place.

    WINNERS: early voters.

    Similar Stories:
  • For Once, a Candidate Is Winning the Right Way
  • October 23rd, 2008 . by Christian Leftist Posted in Election 2008, disenfranchisement, elections, voting rights | No Comments » Print This Post Print This Post


    For Once, a Candidate Is Winning the Right Way

    I came to an understanding with myself on Wednesday night that makes me feel a little better about my soul but slightly worried for my future as a business person.

    I flat-out told an undecided voter — one who was undecided, open, friendly, ready to talk politics and probably leaning Obama after watching the debate in the room where his Democratic friend was — that when it came down to it, I’d rather he vote for McCain than not vote at all.

    This is not a position Democrats are going to shout from the rooftops (Republicans should shout it, but only to registered Republicans if they plan to win). Look at what happened when Bush decided to force elections on the Gaza Strip. I bet Hamas is still thanking him for that blunder. “Real democracy” doesn’t necessarily mean that the populace will vote in its own best interests. If you want to run a registration drive, be sure you know what audiences you’re targeting and whether you can afford to spend the time educating and persuding them to vote for your issues.

    As you know, my suggestion is probably not the wisest thing to say to someone who might be looking for an excuse not to vote for your candidate but who wants to know that someone understands, that he’s doing the right thing.

    I said it anyway.

    As badly as I want and need and hope and pray for Obama to win this election, as painful as the last eight years have been, as furious as I am with the Bush Administration and conservatives right now, I don’t want to sink to their level. I want to win this fairly. I need to know that of the people who care enough to actually register, stay informed and vote on November 4th, more of them believe that Barack Obama is the better person for the office. I have to see that my neighbors and relatives and friends and peers and acquaintances and rivals and those who are strangers to me all stop what they are doing or could be doing on that Tuesday and do whatever it takes to cast their ballots because they give a damn about what happens on this planet and know that as a great force in world history, part of the planet’s future depends on what we decide and will lay out a path forward upon which the next generation will have to walk.

    Yes, there are many, many important decisions that we cannot afford to make under the rule of another conservative, like Supreme Court appointments, business regulation and civil rights laws. In the shadow of the steps our country has taken backwards, those choices are more critical and more prescient than ever. That doesn’t change the fact that a dishonorable victory would feel hollow and hypocritical.

    What would it say about the progressives of this country if we had to resort to suppression, intimidation, threats of violence, misinformation, propaganda, cracking, fraud, trickery and outright lies in order to triumph?

    How would we sleep at night, when despite knowing that acts of nature and of artificial means had melded together so fortuitously at one time, that the rest of the world thought we had a fighting chance to prove that we are who we say we are and not just a band of selfsh people who want all the power and privilege without the sacrifice or the responsibility, that for once we didn’t have to say one thing but believe another or make rules for others to obey that we ourselves do not follow, that we had held in our grasp all the cards, that the deck was all but spent and someone had probably dealt us a winning suit, knowing we might yet turn back from the precipice — that the very stars had aligned for our cause — despite having all these favors, we still had so little faith in ourselves that we cheated and forfeited the game to avoid risking the hand?

    How would anyone else trust us or believe in our sincerity ever again? How would we trust ourselves?

    I think Bill Maher put it perfectly last night on Larry King Live when he said, “If you want to be the first black man to do anything, you have to be better than anyone else.” That is what Obama has done. It was not John McCain who held to his straight-talk mantra that “he’d rather lose the election than win the war.” It was Barack Obama who staked his candidacy on the idea that a candidate could run for a political office without employing dirty tricks and personal attacks and win. Unlike McCain, Obama’s not using the type of smear tactics Bush’s unofficial advocates used to defeat him in 2000, like automated voice calls that claim Obama’s close friends with a terrorist, that the terrorist’s group killed multiple civilians (Weather Underground killed one police officer, and William Ayers was never convicted of a felony related to the WU), or that Obama’s a radical leftist who will bring socialism — oh, the horror! — to Washington, D.C. Obama’s not the one who’s consulting with a GOP state manager who gave talking points to his volunteers on how to compare Barack to Osama Bin Laden ‘”because they both have friends who attacked the Pentagon.” Nor does he stir up a cloud of fear, panic and xenophobia with implications about his opponent’s origins that are both nativist and racist, then make no clarifications when the racists at his rallies shout out “Terrorist!” and “Kill him!” or fail to point out that not all Muslims are Arab, not all Arabs are Muslims, and not many Muslims are terrorists, then demand that his opponent APOLOGIZE for RIGHTLY calling the bigots on their hate speech and for chastising him for allowing such behavior to go unchallenged. Those are but a sampling of the varied skill sets that McCain has acquired over the course of the campaign as the campaign has slowly acquired him.

    McCain’s bid for the presidency, in all its Sarah Palin-esque glory, has taken on a slimy, rotten personality of its own, and as we count down the days until the final voting, this malicious and odious quest to tar and feather Obama’s reputation — not just as a candidate, but as an American — threatens to overwhelm its creator and take him with it on a ride to the end, no matter if that end justifies the means or not.

    This is our first true Web 2.0, YouTube-enabled, 24/7 live-blogged and live-recorded presidential election in history. Every off-color joke, every lie, every gaffe or faux pas, every contradicting quote, every smirk of contempt and twitch of apoplectic rage, every hate-filled diatribe, every nasty, false email circulated, all of it will be logged, categorized, downloaded, cached, duplicated, mashed up, remixed and re-distributed, forever. We inhabit a world where the press no longer sleeps because its power never lies solely in corporate hands anymore. Someone is always watching, witnessing, waiting for the first mistake. Sure, the pseudo-intellectuals and Karl Roves of the future will lie through their teeth, even when the footage is playing back at them, but every time that happens, they reduce their honor and the ethical capital they have to spend. They look that much worse.

    For his sake, I hope that’s the price John McCain is willing to pay in order to win: his honor and integrity. That is what this race has cost him — his legacy. Long after he is gone, people will remember how low one campaign sunk to reach so high. He must know by now that bloggers never forget. I know I won’t.

    Similar Stories:
  • Pennsylvania Primary - watch out for that second page!
  • How desperate does the GOP have to be to sidestep the Constitution?
  • October 18th, 2008 . by Christian Leftist Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » Print This Post Print This Post


    Bush Administration Blocks Birth Control in Africa (Again)

    …Aaaand we’ve come full-circle.

    I knew George W. Bush was going to give me a headache when in January 2001 he used his second day in office to deny African aid organizations U.S. funding if they chose to give women information about abortions. Never mind that the drugs to prevent spreading HIV to one’s unborn child weren’t usually available to women in poorer countries back then; they may not be now. The point was that regardless of the final decision women may have made, the mere action of discussing the option of aborting was enough to economically devastate non-profit aid groups who were giving health care to women who needed more than almost any other group in the world.

    Now it appears that Dubya wasn’t done making his point.

    Nicholas Kristof reported that USAID, or the United States Agency for International Development, has ordered that six African countries it serves not use any of its money to supply British aid organization Marie Stopes International with any condoms, I.U.D.s, birth control pills or any other contraceptive devices whatsoever.

    The Bush Administration has falsely claimed that this action was a response to Marie Stopes Int’l.’s support of the Chinese government’s family-planning policies. Yes, China still madates that couples have only one child, and this law occasionally results in forced abortions, and it’s a horrible way to exert population control, but there is absolutely no evidence of MSI’s involvement or support for such measures. It’s outright dishonesty and misinformation.

    GWB taking out the religious right’s issues with Planned Parenthood on some of the most vulnerable and destitute human beings in the world was not a responsible, moral, or ethical move seven years ago. It isn’t a good move now.

    Similar Stories:
  • Yet Another Bush Administration Hire Resigns for Moral Hypocrisy
  • $35 billion for health care or $190 billion for an unjust war?
  • October 17th, 2008 . by Christian Leftist Posted in AIDS, Bush administration, abstinence-only programs, health care, international news, women's rights | No Comments » Print This Post Print This Post


    2008.10.15 - This Week in Racism 6 - The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil…

    …is that good men do nothing. Or in this particular struggle, to stand by and watch passively as friends, neighbors and peers engage in hideous acts of moral repugnance.

    Here are some McCain supporters in Lehigh, PA waiting to get into Lehigh Universty to hear him at a rally.

    The transcript:

    The protesters line one side of a street leading to a parking lotto the auditorium, while McCain supporters form a fast-moving line on the opposite side with many more people. A quick pan reveals a sampling of the protesters’ signs and slogans. McCain supporters shout insults at the protesters as they file past them, sometimes insulting the reporter as well.

    McCain Man 01: …And one thing we don’t need is another lawyer in Washington, and that’s Barack Obama! He’s a lawyer!

    McCain Man 02: (to the cameraman/reporter) I think you’re stupid. *woman grins in background*
    Reporter: Why, sir?
    McCain Man 02: *looks uncomfortable, as if he didn’t expect reporter to reply to his insult* Because if that guy gets elected, he hangs around with terrorists…
    Reporter: Who’s [sic] the terrorists?
    McCain Man 02: Obama.

    McCain Man 03: Obama’s a terrorist! Don’t you know that?

    McCain Man 04: Obama’s a Muslim! He’s a terrorist himself!
    Reporter: Do you really believe that, sir? *pause* Do you really believe that? Do you believe Senator Obama’s a terrorist?
    McCain Man 04: (to reporter) I believe he supports terrorism.

    McCain Man 05: (to protestors) *flips them off* Here it is! Love it.

    McCain Man 06: Commie f*ggots! Commie f*ggots…

    McCain Woman 01: He’s a terrorist.

    Some middle-aged woman cackles at an off-camera joke or insult. In the background, another younger women stops and shouts at the protestors.

    McCain Woman 02: GO HOME!

    McCain Woman 03: *points at protestors* GO HOME!

    McCain Man 07: Go get a job! Go get a job!

    McCain Man 08: Go get a job.

    McCain Man 09: GET A JOB!

    …et cetera. It gets worse. Much, much worse. It’s not the only video on YouTube, either. If you have a strong gag reflex, search for “Obama monkey.”

    20 more days.

    Similar Stories:
  • 2008.05.14 - This Week in Racism: Bar offers racist T-shirts of Obama
  • Hillary’s Hike Uphill
  • October 15th, 2008 . by Christian Leftist Posted in Barack Obama, Election 2008, John McCain, This Week in Racism, elections, racism, racist whackjobs | No Comments » Print This Post Print This Post


    « Previous Entries